![]() ![]() With the program I am able to now track the work of course which is the prime function as far as our technical work. The second time around, now at the U of Oregon, the learning curve was much less and the time to input the inventory was about one half the amount of time. Please bear in mind a good deal of that time was learning the new system. We have about 140 instruments to track.Īt Luther I was able to assign the set up to a student who spent about 30 hours doing the work. It works very well for small to medium sized inventory. ![]() He developed the platform while the technician at E Washington U. In both cases-Luther and now the U of Oregon-I have input the information via the schema provided by Alan McCoy and available on the CAUT web site. ![]() The program is the easy part but spending the time to input the data is quite another. While at Luther College I had to give a HUGE sales pitch to a committee of three computer folks who would make the final decision about the program purchase. I have been using the FileMaker format for about 8 years with great success. You can use a simple spreadsheet but the rows get overly populated over time unless you do an annual sheet for each year and assemble them into a more complete record.Īs I have not worked at all with Gazelle I can't comment on it other than it has received great reviews from the retail side among those I know who use the system. Although the task to convert the note card system is a bit daunting, especially when there are many pianos to tune, the time invested is worth it. Having inherited not one but three schools with NO RECORDS or ones that were interrupted, I would have been quite happy with a set of note cards. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |